Monumental Forms and Fleeting Emotions: A Review of Architectural Forms 173 by Anastasia Koronskaya

Professional Art Review

Title: Architectural Forms 173
Medium: Oil on canvas
Dimensions: 100 × 70 cm
Year: 2025
Artist: Anastasia Koronskaya

Formal Analysis

Architectural Forms 173 masterfully blends expressive abstraction with architectural precision. Anastasia Koronskaya constructs a composition where monumental forms emerge from dynamic brushstrokes, creating a structure that balances between reality and vision. The artist skillfully manipulates light and shadow, achieving a sense of depth and architectural weight while maintaining an intense emotional charge.

The painting’s color palette is built on the contrast between warm, saturated reds and deep blues, generating tension between stability and movement. The interplay of these colors introduces an element of uncertainty, as if the structure depicted on the canvas is in a constant state of transformation. The impasto technique and bold application of a palette knife create a textured surface, giving the piece an organic, almost eroded quality. In this way, Koronskaya introduces an element of deconstruction, suggesting that the monumental forms we build—both in the real world and in our minds—are subject to decay and change.

Interpretation and Context

The painting aligns with the tradition of architectural abstraction, yet it transcends purely formal exploration. Koronskaya uses urban structures as a metaphor for the human condition. The monumental forms dominating the composition may symbolize both the achievements of civilization and their impermanence. One can see echoes of Gothic cathedrals, futuristic metropolises, or even the ruins of past cultures—the piece becomes a reflection on time, memory, and transience.

Many of Koronskaya’s earlier works also explore spatial themes and their psychological impact. Exhibitions such as “Urbán”“Space Within Space”, and “Intersections” examined the relationship between architecture and emotions, portraying cities as places of both refuge and alienation. In Architectural Forms 173, this duality is particularly striking—the painting exudes strength and monumentality while, through its blurred edges and subtle lighting, introducing a sense of nostalgia and impermanence.

Influence and Unique Style

Anastasia Koronskaya continues to develop her distinctive artistic language, merging rigid geometry with expressive use of color and texture. While her work echoes modernist experiments by Kandinsky or late-period Richter, her compositional approach remains uniquely her own. Her ability to infuse monumental structures with emotional depth sets her apart—these are not just forms, but carriers of narratives, hidden meanings, and personal experiences.

Her technique, which involves layering paint, gives the artwork an internal rhythm, making the structures seem both permanent and ephemeral—built and deconstructed simultaneously.

Conclusion

Architectural Forms 173 is a profoundly mature composition, blending technical precision with emotional intensity. The painting captivates not only through its structure and color but also through its hidden meaning—it tells a story of construction and decay, of memory embedded in space, and of the fragility of grand ideas.

Koronskaya once again proves that her work is more than formal experimentation—it is a deep reflection on architecture as a metaphor for human experience.

Rafael Drummer

Contemporary Art Critic

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

wpChatIcon
Scroll to Top